Oh dear!

Following on from our last post we have done a bit of research and we conclude that Labour are as good as finished. Perhaps Nottingham will finally take down the red flag at the next round of elections.......?

One of Britain's biggest trade unions yesterday reacted to the "contempt" with which workers are treated by the government by withdrawing financial support from six Labour MPs it said were not doing enough to support union policies.

The GMB, which has 600,000 members, named the first six of 35 Labour MPs it will refuse to support at the next General Election. However, a move to disaffiliate the trade union from the party, severing the formal link with Labour, will not go ahead and the union intends that its annual £1.7m in fees and local grants will continue.

The union had examined the records of the 108 GMB-sponsored MPs in parliament and those who had not, in the GMB's view, performed well, will have their funds cut. The funding is worth £20,000 annually to the constituency Labour parties who support the work of MPs.
advertisement

The first MPs to be named are Meg Munn, junior minister at the Foreign Office and MP for Sheffield Heeley; Stephen Ladywood, MP for Thanet South and vice-chairman of the Labour Party; and four parliamentary private secretaries to ministers: Christine Russell, MP for Chester, Roberta Blackman-Woods (Durham), Sharon Hodgson (Gateshead East), and Adrian Bailey (West Bromwich West). No Scottish MPs are on the union divorce list.

General secretary Paul Kenny said the union was no longer prepared to fund MPs who treated workers with "contempt". The GMB leader also warned that the union could reduce the size of its annual affiliation to Labour, worth £1.2m a year.

The Labour Party is £24m in debt and has over £13m of loans up for renegotiation this year, but Mr Kenny told the union's annual conference in Plymouth that union funds would not be used to bail out the debt.

Read more here

Labour party debt: money to be laundered through Unions?

The Guardian reported on Thursday the 29th of May that:

Senior officials in the Labour party, including Gordon Brown, could become personally liable for millions of pounds in debt unless new donors can be found within weeks, the Guardian has learned.

The party has five weeks to find £7.45m to pay off loans to banks and wealthy donors recruited by Lord Levy, Tony Blair's former chief fundraiser, or become insolvent. A further £6.2m will have to be repaid by Christmas - making £13.65m in all. The sum amounts to two-thirds of the party's annual income from donations.

According to one of my fellow BNP activists, a programme aired today by the Bolshevik Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) alleges that trade union leaders have been in and out of Downing Street all week to discuss government subsidies/loans to facilitate 'modernisation', something seemingly linked to preparation for our full immersion into the European Union.

We are suspicious that this 'modernisation' money is really a front to launder public money through Unions, for them to re-donate the funds allocated so that the Labour party can use it to pay off the party debt. More info to follow.

Did you know that Gordon Brown has squandered £1.2 trillion in ten years?

Gordon Brown has a degree in history and after university he worked as a politics lecturer and as a journalist. In 1983 he became an MP and he’s been a politician ever since. The point? He has no more training in economics or finance than the average taxi driver, and even less experience of business. So how on earth did Gordon Brown fool the nation into thinking that he was some kind of economic expert who was being careful with the country’s finances?

He has turned out to be the biggest waster of all time. New Labour has squandered an eye-popping £50,000 per family and more, supposedly implementing its promises of 1997 to transform our hospitals, schools, police, pensions and social services. But in truth it has produced very little other than a vast, life-blood sucking bureaucracy.

£185 billion extra has been spent on education – yet our children are no better educated.

Health has received £269 billion extra yet there are fewer beds in the NHS than a decade ago and many of us are too scared of catching something to go near the beds there are.

An extra £80 billion has gone on policing and justice but you’d be hard pushed to find anyone who feels safer now than ten years ago. That’s because they’re not – police Reported Crime Figures show that violent crime has more than doubled since 1998.

Here’s how some of it was spent:

£500m spent on the government’s literacy program that produced virtually no improvement.

£722m spent on the various bureaucrats employed by the state to ensure we receive good healthcare – double the 1998 sum.

£600m spent on management consultancy fees by the NHS - £15,000 for each manager employed, equivalent to £3000 per bed.

£800m spent by the NHS every year on agency nurses.

Out of touch Labour politicians and bureaucrats have squandered most of our hard-earned cash with stupidity and incompetence that’s probably unequalled in British history. They have created a culture where they make mistakes and never admit them, they cover up their failings and their bungling is rewarded with promotion, honours and generous inflation-proof pensions. Today they make the same promises on crime, on education, on cutting red tape, that they made ten years ago and failed to deliver on. And they wonder why we don’t believe them.

Gordon and his cronies have squandered the proceeds of ten years of economic ‘good times’ presiding over a system that rewarded blatant incompetence. Now the money has gone, the economy is turning sour and we are left to pick up the pieces. New Labour in its arrogance expects us to pay for their mess.

They have had their chance to build a society fit for the British people and they have failed again. The British National Party will make sure it is the dishonest, incompetent, greedy Labour politicians that pay.

Read the full appalling story in the book ‘Squandered’ by David Craig

By Jack Ashton

Integrity vs Integration

‘Culture’ has a convenient haziness about it. There can be a ‘culture of violence’ or a ‘culture of apathy’ and so on. In the strictest definition, it is simply a way of life at any one given time.

Of course, healthy cultures do not stagnate, they change and evolve. Historically however, it is the customs and manners of people that have altered over time; not the people themselves who remain inherently the same.

The obligation of a multi-racial society however is different. It is considered to be a progressive step for mankind and anybody not willing to take it is regarded as a pariah.

It is interesting to note that both the capitalist establishment and those on the Left (who insist they are an alternative to the system) are wholeheartedly in favour of this ‘progress’. Both assert, albeit from apparently different perspectives that shared common values are more important than collective notions that are not defined by them, such as racial origin and gender. The left believe that race and gender divide the working class and act as a barrier to the unification necessary to revolt and thus bring the capitalist system tumbling down in the process. Those on the capitalist right however dislike notions of ethnic origin and gender roles for quite a different reason: predominately because sentiments arising from individuality can surpass the desire for status and power achievable only by competition as part of their financial game plan.

An article in the Capitalist magazine by Peter Schwartz entitled “The Racism of Diversity”: states the following: “If racism is to be renounced, it is the basis of individualism, including individual free will that must be upheld. There is no way to bring about racial integration except by completely disregarding colour.” We need to identify “diversity” for what it is: a malignant policy that harms everyone, because it is the very essence of racism itself”.

By Stewart Davis

Is Nationalism akin to Racism?

Nationalistic feelings, and having pride in one’s country, history, achievements, bloodlines, and cultural heritage are not the catalysts, nor the building blocks, or markers, of outward hatred toward others however persistent the media tries to spread this myth.

For many of us, memories of our childhood and the stories imparted to us by our elders are the compass headings by which we as nationalists navigate a peaceful path through life. Therefore; ‘racism’ could not be further from the hearts of traditional nationalists as many of us can testify to being sternly, yet fairly disciplined from a young age - something that’s been outlawed by our LIB/LAB/CON one-party-state politicians who deride the family unit and moreover society with political correctness: The ideology behind the pretence that liberalism, human right laws, and multiculturalism are the essential building blocks of the type of character necessary to survive and be accepted in the globalist world.

Thankfully, so few people are now buying in to the LIB/LAB/CON propaganda that nationalism across Europe is beginning to enjoy a widespread renaissance. The old adage that ‘good will triumph over evil’ will come to fruition when people start to see political correctness for the evil, Marxist tool it truly is. Communism is currently rife among British politics and we are all feeling the damaging effects of this draconian ideology daily.

I predict that soon; when the British lion has awoken from its long, long sleep our LIB/LAB/CON traitors will need to quickly flee these islands or face the true might of the British people the vast majority of whom have Saxon and Viking fighting ancestry deeply engrained within their genome which was pivotal in securing our presence here some 15,000 years ago.

Stewart Davis.